Field Guide Series — Book 01

They're Lying to You

27 verbal deception indicators across three tiers. The complete architecture of how language behaves under deception, from the most reliable patterns to the ones most analysts over-apply.

Get the free preview

Four complete indicators from the full guide, delivered to your inbox. No account required.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

What the preview covers

01

Non-Contracted Denial

Reliability: Moderate-high

Truthful denials almost universally use contractions. When someone says "I did not do that" rather than "I didn't do that," the full form under stress is a pattern Pennebaker's language research identifies as psychologically significant. The extra syllable creates distance from the denial itself.

02

Territorial Qualifier

Reliability: Moderate

Deceptive accounts frequently narrow the scope of a denial using geographic or ownership language. "That money was not in my account" rather than "I didn't take the money." The qualifier limits the denial to a specific territory, leaving everything outside it unaddressed.

03

Failure to Deny

Reliability: Moderate-high

When directly accused, some responses substitute character references, procedural objections, or expressions of indignation for the denial itself. "Do you know what kind of person I am?" is not a denial. Research by Ekman and Vrij documents this as one of the more reliable patterns in interview transcripts.

04

Pronoun Avoidance

Reliability: Moderate

First-person singular pronouns drop in frequency during deceptive accounts, a finding consistent across Pennebaker's corpus analysis. "The report was filed on Tuesday" removes the actor entirely. Passive constructions and third-person framing create psychological distance from the event being described.

Full Edition — 27 Indicators

Recognition Drills after every chapter, annotated transcripts, a Four-Week Practice Protocol, and a Quick Reference Cheat Sheet. Season one rate: $27.

View Full Edition